Companies today seem to be wanting the world when they hire people; young millennial, senior level workers. They look for that utopian candidate, already trained with numerous years of experience. Companies no longer want to mold employees into their ideal candidate. Internal training programs have pretty much died. While, I understand they want people who can hit the ground running and can get up to speed in a short period of time, are they shooting themselves by not considering someone who has the knowledge, capability and older, but not necessarily have actual work experience in a work environment?

JobAd Companies might advertise a “junior” position, but then demand intermediate or senior level knowledge. Stop saying 0-3 years and then dismiss the 0 to 2 years of experience in that criteria. Frankly, companies don’t know what they want. Companies advertise their utopian wish list, in hopes they will find someone with all their wishes and dismiss the people who have 3 of the no longer find real entry-level or junior openings. So if a person in the IT arena with over 20 years IT experience in various technologies can’t even get in at the entry-level or junior level, how in the hell do you ever expect them to get to the intermediate or senior level? Frankly, I’m thinking my Master’s in Computer and Information Systems was a waste of time and money. All the thousands of dollars investing in books and/or software to learn the new “emerging” technology has all been a waste. Continue reading


Mozilla: Inequality Opportunity Employer

Mozilla, makers of Firefox browser, has purposely ousted their CEO because he contributed to CA Proposition 8 in 2008. For those who can’t remember Proposition 8 made gay marriage illegal in California. Remember Barack Obama also was opposed to gay marriage in 2008. Proposition 8 passed with overwhelming numbers by the voters of California. However, a judge felt the peoples vote doesn’t count and declared it was unconstitutional. Frankly, where does it say that “marriage” is a right in the Constitution? In addition, sexual preference protection is not in the Constitution.
Continue reading

IRS Scandal and Senator Michael Bennet

Most everyone has heard of the IRS Scandal created and admitted by the IRS on a Friday afternoon. Why would they release this info late on a Friday? When the Obama White House releases something on a Friday they hope it gets little attention and the media will ignore it. It is their way to release potentially damaging information or information they want to keep under the radar getting little air time. Obama is notorious for releasing his Executive Orders on Fridays.

However, when the IRS admits something Tea Party and other conservatives groups have been saying all along, it isn’t going to pass the attention of Republicans or Conservatives. You also probably wondering why now, why would they admit such a thing? Well those complaints have not gone unheeded. Many in Congress began to investigate. After an IG report was due for release which implicated “a few rogue” agents in the Cincinnati IRS office for purposely targeting Conservative/Republican, Christian, Pro-Life, Tea Party, and Jewish groups on their 501 c3 or 4 applications, the IRS had to come clean. Over 500 groups targeted with some who received extra special attention from the IRS; asking illegal questions, unnecessary questions, and delaying their application. Some have waited up to three years since they first filed. Some still do not have their approval. Continue reading

Democrats Plan To Confiscate Guns in NY

New York Assemblyman Steve McLaughlin took a grand leap and posted the plans of NY legislatures to actually confiscate guns from law abiding citizens. The 2nd Amendment does not restrict the type of arms anyone can own., We can at least agree that no one needs a bazooka, a fully automatic weapon, or a tank to protect their property, hunt with, or protect from tyranny. We can also agree that STATE background checks and arms training conducted. The goal is to get the guns out of the hands of the people who use them to kill people.

However, it seems the government has no problem when drug cartels or criminals own these weapons. If they truly wanted to curb gun violence they would crack down on felons with guns. This would jeopardize police funding. Less violence from criminals = less police on the job, a threat to Unions.

You all do know that Governor Cuomo’s during his rush to pass his legislation, did not include an exemption for Police in NY. His eagerness and lust for gun control just jeopardize every NY citizen. Love those logical Democrats.

When we have government officials try to circumvent the Constitution because they think they know what is good for their citizens, we have the makings of a Marxist. Yes, you heard me. The first thing Hitler, Mao, Stalin and all the other dictators did was to confiscate the guns from law abiding citizens. Once that occurred, each of these Marxists slaughtered millions of people. Citizens had no way to defend themselves from tyranny.

The Founding Fathers placed this into our Constitution to secure the new American citizens from the tyranny of a British King. Everything they fought for during the American Revolution was for freedom. My forefathers fought in this war. You may not agree with them, but most of us do. The 2nd Amendment indicates that “a well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state“. In colonial times the militia was ordinary citizens. When it was necessary citizens formed the militia, a militia that needs arms. This comes to the second part of the amendment “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed“. Thus no laws to restrict the right to own a gun and the ammunition that goes in that gun, that is a given.

During colonial times the guns were not as sophisticated as they are today. Many were muskets or pistols. I am pretty sure our Founding Fathers foresaw that Arms would improve and described them generically for that very reason.

Just because something did not exist at the time of the Constitution does not make it null and void. Democrats argue that AR-15 or any other assault weapons didn’t exist at writing of the Constitution, thus not protected. Well okay the Internet isn’t protected either under that premise. Free speech on the Internet would not exist. Cable News did not exist either, thus not protected. Anything that did not exist at the writing of the Constitution would become null and void under the Democrats argument. We are in modern times; the Constitution does not change at the whims of any government.

If we cannot uphold the Constitution as written, we have just turned a Republic into a dictatorship. We will have the same President as long as Venezuela has had Hugo Chavez and Cuba has had Castro. Last I checked Cubans made rafts to escape Cuba’s dictator and oppressive government. Yet many Democrats seem okay with this type of government, well of course, they envision they will be in charge.

Gun control has never worked for the simple reason it goes after the law abiding citizens and not the felons or mentally ill patients that should never own, much less be around guns. The previous ban on “assault weapons” never worked. The criminals still had the guns. If you talk to a Democrat you get the impression they think criminals follow gun laws, but their ultimate goal is to remove the obstacle of guns from the citizens and forcing their government onto the people. They cannot effectively execute their agenda if the citizens are armed. Think about this. They don’t care about your protection; they only care about keeping power and dictating to the American people how they should live in their fantasy world. Armed citizens will fight back if their freedom is at stake. Most citizens do not want to take up arms against our government, but our current government wants to create a revolution with its citizens. Obama and his administrations follow Saul Alinsky’s “Rule for Radicals”; they are all about Revolution. Read up on Agenda 21 by the U.N. I wrote an article on this subject also.

Yeah, I know crazy talk, but mark my words one day you will be saying, “Oh my, she was spot on”.

Now let’s get to Colorado. Governor Higgenlooper, a Democrat might have similar plans as Governor Cuomo of New York. He has already hinted at making sweeping changes similar to Governor Cuomo. He has talked about removing Concealed Carry permits. I for one love the idea that my community college where I teach allows Concealed Carry. I realize I am not 100% protected, but I have a better chance of not running into a gunman than if it were a “gun free zone”. Nothing waves “we are sitting ducks” like a place who announces we are a “gun free zone”. We also have armed police. We now have two gun ranges nearby. Yeah, my college is less likely to be a target.

So Governor Higgenlooper, I will put you on notice sir. If you do anything to infringe on the 2nd Amendment, I will do everything in my power to ensure your reelection fails or I may even start a petition for your recall. I have already contacted by Republican Congressman about my wishes to protect the 2nd Amendment in the state of Colorado.

When you pass unconstitutional laws because you think you know what is best for people, you are committing the greatest sin of all: Treason. It also makes you arrogant and a narcissist. I say to you, “Who the hell do you think you are”? My safety and the right to protect myself trump your fantasy world.

Agenda 21 in Colorado: Sustainable Development

Many people have not heard of Agenda 21, but have heard of Sustainable Development in their area. Colorado is pushing this agenda immensely and people need to know what is going on. These two key words (Agenda 21/Sustainable) are one and the same. Don’t take my word for it visit the UN and do a search on Agenda 21. The first article I read is from 1999, so they have had a long time to gradually implement this alarming agenda. Here is the link Programme for the Further Implementation of Agenda 21.and if you need further proof that Agenda 21 and Sustainability are the same thing this link should confirm this is not a conspiracy theory. This is real people and we should be alarmed. Division of Sustainability Development. Here is the UN statement.

Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment.

Here is our site in our own back yard. Denver is the perfect place to begin this implementation. Why, well Denver is predominately Liberal and you have the bigger Universities; this is a Liberal Progressive agenda too. Okay so Republicans are against this, so this is just a partisan issue dreamed up by Republicans. NO, there are Republican Progressives who are behind this also. This is an American issue. This is a people issue. I don’t care what side you lean. Slowly we are losing our freedoms without our awareness.

From a website in their owns words it says,

The City and County of Denver Office of Sustainability invites you to weigh in on the city’s draft 2020 goals for air quality, energy, food, housing, land use, materials, mobility, water, and workforce at one of their upcoming community meetings. Each meeting will give participants an opportunity to provide suggestions on how best to reach these goals and meet the new Chief Sustainability Officer, Jerry Tinianow.   It will also be a great way to meet likeminded neighbors who are interested in ensuring Denver continues to be one of the greenest cities in the nation!”

On the surface you say, what is wrong with this? We should take steps to make our communities safer, build logically, and use our land wisely, and create better transportation methods. Yes on the surface this is all good and individually this seems good. However, what they don’t tell you that their intent is to put the UN, yes United Nations in charge over our development. In other words if you own land out away from Denver and you use it to raise cattle now, Agenda 21/Sustainable Development can dictate your land cannot be used this way any longer and you have no say so how your land can be used. YOU LOSE ALL RIGHTS TO LAND YOU OWN. Whatever is good for the “collective” is what will happen. They could go so far to eliminate parts of your land where you can’t develop it; declare it as a wetland.

Remember that couple in Idaho who went to build their dream home on their own land and the EPA came in and declared part of their land “wetlands”, thus preventing the couple from building their home and suing. Read the story here: Idaho Couple Allowed to Sue EPA. This is the start of Agenda 21. This was not some overzealous EPA agent. Why should you have to sue the government to use your own land to build a home?

Denver Sustainability Development has moved to utilize Twitter by using numerous hash tags; these are just a few. If you are on Twitter start reading the tweets that go along with this.

  • #COclimate
  • #CoEducation
  • #COefficientbuild
  • #COenergy
  • #COecondevelop
  • #COsustainablebiz

You still might be thinking this is no big deal, why should I read all your links. If you want to bury your head in the sand, so be it. “I can lead you to water, but I can’t make you drink it”. Also, if this statement from the Denver Sustainability website does not cause some pause from you, then you are beyond reach and I will not waste my time with you.

Rising rates of poverty, starvation, desertification, and pollution, and shrinking food production, forests, energy supplies, fish populations and other indicators reveal that current human population exceeds the planet’s carrying capacity.  Carrying capacity is defined as the maximum population number of an organism that can be supported given the food, habitat, water and other necessities available in that biological system.

I don’t about you, but this sounds like “population control“.

The UN came to Denver to observe our election at the invite of the NAACP and Acorn. Don’t be ignorant people. This is real, it is here, and you are becoming a part of it whether you like it or not; unless we fight for our God given rights and those given to us by the Constitution and Bill of Rights. The UN Agenda 21 will remove those rights and we will fall under UN jurisdiction.

Here is more websites here in Colorado or for Colorado, because people and businesses are jumping onto this bandwagon probably not knowing why.

Additional Links:

  1. Colorado Government
  2. Sustainable Living
  6. University of Colorado
  7. Colorado Springs
  10. Aspen Times Article
  11. UC Denver
  12. Durango, CO (pdf file)

Citizens of Colorado you need to be aware of Agenda 21/Sustainable Development from the UN. If you don’t care about the state or U.S. sovereignty and the loss of your freedom, regardless of political views, then don’t read anything on this topic. Hide your head in the sand and hope it goes away or others do something to stop it.

There is a lot to take in. You may have to read in small doses so you do not burn out on this topic. Remember it started in 1992 and Clinton, let’s make sure it ends under Obama and 2012/13. If you read no other links read the UN’s articles on Agenda 21. Then listen in your local area on TV, radio or printed media for “Sustainable Development”. I know I have heard my local TV stations use this term.

I want clean air, clean water, and to use our lands wisely. I don’t want the UN to be in control or my local government to tell me I can’t grow tomatoes in my backyard. I don’t want my hard earned money to go to countries to solve their poverty problems. Stop their governments from oppressing their own citizens and stealing monies from them that places them in poverty. Other countries see our wealth as a personal ATM. Don’t go down without a fight.

Most of all educate yourself.

Waldo Canyon Fire: Careless Actions or Arsonist

Update: 7/12/2012

KKTV News 11 has reported that the Waldo Canyon Fire is 100% contained. However that does not mean the fire is out. Firefighters are still on scene, but has significantly reduced from the estimated 1500 or so originally on scene during the height of the fire. Approximately 90 firefighters remain in service in the event of further flair ups.

The two bodies found at 2910 Rossmere Street were identified as William Everett, 74 and Barbara Everett, 73 according to KKTV News. The couple had not registered for the emergency evacuation notification service.

The crash in Montana took the lives of four and injured two individuals according to an update by CBS News. Continue reading